The controversy surrounding the proposed merger between Anglo American PLC and Vancouver-based Teck Resources Ltd. has reignited old tensions among Indigenous communities in northern Ontario. A prominent Indigenous advocate, Charles Hookimaw, has voiced strong opposition, arguing that Anglo American’s past behavior through its diamond-mining subsidiary De Beers shows a pattern of neglect toward Indigenous rights and environmental responsibility.
1. Background of the Anglo American–Teck Merger
The $70 billion merger proposal between Anglo American PLC and Teck Resources Ltd. has sparked debate across Canada. The new entity, to be called Anglo Teck, plans to establish its headquarters in Vancouver, promising long-term benefits for the country’s mining sector. However, Indigenous communities remain skeptical about these claims.
2. Who Is Charles Hookimaw?
Charles Hookimaw, the former Director of Lands and Resources for the Attawapiskat First Nation, has been a vocal advocate for Indigenous rights in resource development. In his recent letter to Industry Minister Mélanie Joly, Hookimaw urged the government to closely examine Anglo American’s past conduct before approving the merger.
3. The Letter to Canada’s Industry Minister
Hookimaw’s letter criticized Anglo American for failing to uphold social responsibility and for neglecting the treaty rights of the Attawapiskat community. He stated that despite multiple efforts to foster respectful dialogue, the company “turned a blind eye,” allowing its subsidiary, De Beers, to operate irresponsibly on traditional lands.
4. De Beers’ Troubled Legacy in Attawapiskat
De Beers, 85% owned by Anglo American since 2011, operated the Victor Mine in Attawapiskat from 2008 to 2019. While the mine generated substantial profits, many residents say they saw little to no economic benefit. The community continues to face challenges such as poverty, unsafe drinking water, and a lack of proper housing.
5. Community Impacts: Poverty, Housing, and Clean Water
Residents of Attawapiskat have long struggled with poor living conditions. Despite promises of economic progress, the community remains one of the most impoverished in Canada. In 2013, locals protested by blocking a winter supply road to the mine, demanding accountability and fair treatment.
6. Environmental and Legal Disputes with De Beers
The environmental track record of De Beers has been equally concerning. The company pleaded guilty in 2021 to one count of failing to provide mercury monitoring data in water systems. The First Nation also opposed De Beers’ plan to create an on-site landfill for demolition waste, arguing that it would harm the local ecosystem.
| Issue | De Beers Response | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Mercury monitoring data | Failure to report | Pleaded guilty (2021) |
| Landfill for mine waste | Planned on-site dump | Scrapped after protests |
| Economic benefits | Minimal impact | Ongoing dispute |
7. Anglo American’s Response to Allegations
In response, Anglo American’s Vice President of Communications, Marcelo Esquivel, stated that the merged company would promote “respect for Indigenous and community rights.” The company claims to have established internal guidelines to ensure sustainable and equitable relationships with Indigenous Peoples.
8. The Planned Formation of “Anglo Teck”
If approved, Anglo Teck will combine Anglo American’s global mining expertise with Teck’s strong Canadian presence. The merger aims to enhance investments in clean energy minerals. However, advocates like Hookimaw argue that unless accountability mechanisms are enforced, history may repeat itself.
9. Indigenous Leaders Demand Inclusion in Resource Decisions
Chief Clarence Louie of the Osoyoos Indian Band also expressed concern that the merger could affect First Nations without their input. He emphasized that meaningful Indigenous participation is non-negotiable for any large-scale mining project in Canada.
10. The Future of Indigenous Rights in Canadian Mining
The ongoing review of the merger has raised broader questions about Indigenous sovereignty in resource extraction. Activists insist that future mining projects must prioritize environmental protection, fair revenue sharing, and community consent before proceeding.
11. Lessons from the Attawapiskat Experience
The Attawapiskat experience serves as a cautionary tale for Canada’s mining industry. Without transparency and equitable engagement, even billion-dollar projects can deepen mistrust between corporations and Indigenous Peoples.
12. Conclusion: Moving Toward Responsible Resource Development
As Canada weighs the potential benefits of the Anglo American–Teck merger, Indigenous voices like Hookimaw’s remind policymakers that progress cannot come at the expense of justice and environmental care. True reconciliation requires both corporate accountability and meaningful partnerships with Indigenous nations.